0405123696 petra@web-data-analytics.com

 732 total views,  3 views today

You might not realise this, but when Google Analytics or Google Ads says which marketing source led to a successful sale, it as actually an estimate, never 100% true. And if you choose different settings between the two you might get completely different numbers from each of them.

Why is this the case? It’s because the attribution is based on the Attribution Model that is being used by the platform. Google Analytics reports in the Last Click attribution model but gives you a basic tool for comparing against a different model. Google Ads lets you set a completely different model, but frustratingly different models to the ones that Google Analytics lets you compare with!

Still, some ability to see how attribution is changed when changing the model is better than nothing, so it is definitely helpful to learn about them.

Let’s say that a customer finds your website by clicking on an a Google Ads search ad, bookmarks the page and then returns to it a week later to make a purchase. Google Analyics attributes your transaction revenue to ‘Direct”. However, the source of the final session which resulted in a purchase may just be one of many visits to your website leading up to the sale

If you want a reasonably accurate idea of your Cost Per Acquisition (CPA), you need to know a few things:

  • Which ad(s) caught the customer’s attention and brought him or her to your website
  • How much you paid for clicks on that ad on average
  • Whether this was the only ad the person clicked on
  • How many times this customer clicked on ads
  • What was the timeframe between when the customer first clicked on an ad and when he or she purchased something

Once you’re working with aggregated data in Google Analytics and Google Ads this is actually really hard to do, so these platforms give you some models that you can pick from that automatically calculate it for you.

In Google Analytics that tool is called the Model Comparison Tool. In Google Ads you choose the model when you select a conversion; plus they also have a Model Comparison Tool as well.

Let’s have a look at how its done in Google Analytics.

Go to CONVERSIONS –> Attribution –> Model Comparison Tool.

Attribution Model Comparison Tool

The Last Interaction model is automatically selected by default.

This model attributes 100% credit to the one final session which resulted in a purchase. This is easy for Google Analytics to calculate, but often this isn’t how people are interacting with ads. They often find your website through one of your ads and come back later via organic search or direct channels. After researching your offer by returning a few times, they may submit a contact form, make a purchase or complete something that you want them to do.

The Last Interaction model gives no credit to the ad that brought the customer to you if it took him more than a single session to commit to a purchase. This is why this attribution model is not such a hit with ad agencies, but loved by SEO agencies!

Attribution Model Comparison Tool

Let’s compare the Last Interaction to a model that is more sympathetic towards Paid Search practitioners – the Linear model.

Click on Select model.

Attribution Model Comparison Tool

Attribution Model Tool in Google AnalyticsAnd select the Linear model. 

The Linear model takes into account every time the person has come to your website and treats each of these times equally. It literally divvies up the value equally between each of the clicks to your website. That includes first session the customer found your website, the final session where he made the purchase and any number of sessions that took place between these two. (Well, that is slightly simplistic – it actually uses a lookback window which means it only counts sessions during that period of “lookback” time).

With linear attribution, every session in the conversion path gets an equal share of credit for the conversion. So if a customer found your website through an ad and returned a week later to make a purchase, both sessions get 50% credit for attributing to a successful conversion.If you have linear attribution set up in your Google Ads conversions settings you’ll actually see 0.5 conversions, 0.25 conversions etc. In your conversion charts.

With both models compared side by side, you can see just how much of an impact they have on the Cost Per Acquisition value.

In this example, according to the Last Interaction model, the cost of each successful conversion is A$81.64 which is almost 17% higher than the linear model’s A$69.85. So if you’re relying on Last Click as your attribution model, you might think its costing you $82 to get a new customer and then write off Google Ads as a cost effective approach. If you measured your attribution differently it could be the difference between a campaign being profitable or not.

And select the Linear model.

Let’s now compare the Last Interaction model with its polar opposite – the First Interaction model.

Select the First Interaction model instead of the Linear model.

First Interaction ModelWhen using paid advertising, the First Interaction model often results in a much lower cost per acquisition when compared to the Last Interaction.

As the name suggests, it attributes 100% credit to the very first session that brought the customer to your website. If a customer finds your website by clicking on one of your ads, it will get all of the credit if the customer makes a purchase on a later session, regardless of how many sessions there are between the click on the ad and the purchase.

When the Last Interaction model is compared head to head with the First Interaction model, there’s no surprise that the latter has lowered the CPA even lower than the Linear model. At A$59.49 in this example, there is a whopping 37.23% difference in the cost per acquisition depending on which model you pick.

First Interaction Model

Just to make life even more complicated, Google Ads doesn’t give you the ability to pick First Interaction model as part of the conversion settings.

Like Google Analytics, it picks Last Interaction by default. Unlike Google Analytics it does let you change the model within the conversion itself, which can lead to different numbers when Google Ads data is compared head to head with Google Analytics data.

Because Last Click is so unfavourable to Paid Search, and because your reported financial ROI is going to have an impact on your budget for ads, I recommend not using Last Click interaction model when looking at Google Ads data unless you don’t have an alternative or unless you are looking at Google Analytics reports without using the Attribution Model tool.

In Google Ads itself, I recommend choosing the Linear model for conversions, or another very similar one called the Positional Model which gives a higher weighting to the first and the last click and a lower weighting to all the clicks in the middle.

leesa dawson

I am so grateful to have met you, as I think your insights are the BEST I have ever come across.

Leesa Dawson CEO, The Uniform Stylist Ecommerce Google Ads April 23, 2020

Kiley Hay Baby Carriers Australia

I have been working with Petra for over a year now after changing from a much larger digital marketing provider and I could not be more pleased with the service and results my business is achieving.

With my previous providers I felt disconnected with limited communication. Petra on the other hand provides me with knowledge and information in a language I can understand that helps me make informed decisions not just about digital marketing but also my e-commerce business as a whole.

Petra has helped me navigate seasonal drops in trade creating a strategy that helped us grow and establish a healthy position in the market. It is an absolute joy to work with someone who loves what they do. I have complete confidence in recommending Petra to anyone considering e-commerce digital marketing, she is efficient, trusted and a true professional.

Kiley Hay CEO of Baby Carriers Australia Ecommerce Google Ads April 23, 2020

david clayton myomasters

Your attention to detail is beyond what I had expected. The detail of the data is incredible. The best part though was to learn the profile demographic - which is very different to whom I think I've been trying to target through social.

David Clayton Director, Myomasters Massage Health Clinic Google Ads April 23, 2020

Nadia Rossi

It has been an absolute pleasure working with Petra over the last year and a half. 1834 Hotels centralises marketing for over 20 hotels around Australia, all with different branding and websites. On an analytics level Petra’s skills have allowed us to monitor and track our marketing efforts in the digital space. Bringing Petra onboard to manage our Google Ads was one of the best marketing decisions we have made. Her thoroughness and attention to detail is incredible, her insights have helped develop better marketing strategies and demonstrate to shareholders return on investment. I would highly recommend working with Petra.

Nadia Rossi Digital Marketing at 1834 Hotels Ecommerce / Hotel Google Ads April 23, 2020

Ian Gale - Sleepwise Clinic

Petra was instrumental in pulling all our clinic's web analytics into one easy to read, dynamic report that's accessible to me at any time, and works with our EXACT booking system.

This has allowed me to see, at a glance, what marketing initiatives are working, need tweaking, or changing altogether, saving me both time and money. I can't recommend her or her analytic services enough.

Ian Gale SleepWise Clinic Analytics Dashboard August 1, 2018